Payer Competition and Cost Shift Ing in Health Care
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper studies a model in which Puo payers contract with one hospital. True costs per patient are not a possible basis for payment, and contracts can only be zuritten on the basis of allocated cost. Payers choose a contract that is fully prospective or fully based on cost allocation, or n paynient scheme that zuould give some weight to eack of these two. We ckaracterize the payers‘ equilibrium contracts arid skow how in equilibrium hospital input decisions are distorted by the payers’ incentives to engage in cost shifting. Two costshifting incentives work in opposite directions, and equilibrium can be characterized by too little or too much care relative to the socially efficient level.
منابع مشابه
Optimisation of Healthcare Contracts: Tensions Between Standardisation and Innovation; Comment on “Competition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?”
An important determinant of health system performance is contracting. Providers often respond to financial incentives, despite the ethical underpinnings of medicine, and payers can craft contracts to influence performance. Yet contracting is highly imperfect in both single-payer and multi-payer health systems. Arguably, in a competitive, multi-payer environment, contractual innovation may occur...
متن کاملAll-payer ratesetting: Down but not out
In the United States, when the cost-containment paradigm shifted from regulation to competition, all-payer hospital ratesetting went out of favor. After reviewing the published literature and supplementing the existing literature with more current information, the author concludes that all-payer ratesetting is able to meet its multiple objectives of cost containment, reduction of the amount of ...
متن کاملSingle payer meets managed competition: the case for public funding and private delivery.
Common sense and empirical evidence suggest that single-payer health insurance, combined with competitive private delivery, would be the most cost-effective way of achieving the major, widely accepted goals of health care reform. Among the current presidential candidates, Kucinich and Gravel have the most promising reform proposals, with Edwards's and Obama's as fall-backs.
متن کاملHospital competition and patient-perceived quality of care: Evidence from a single-payer system in Taiwan.
OBJECTIVES To examine the effects of market competition on patient-perceived quality of care under a single-payer system in Taiwan. METHODS Data came from two nationwide surveys conducted on discharged patients and National Health Insurance (NHI) hospital claim datasets in 2002 and 2004. Competition was measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Quality of care was measured by patient-...
متن کاملManaged competition: maintaining health care within the private sector.
The health care reform debate has been effective in bringing visibility nor only to cost containment issues, but to the need for expanded access to health care. The reform strategies that are currently under consideration are incremental changes that build on the transition in health care that has been underway for more than a decade. A hallmark of that transition is managed care arrangements, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004